By Lloyd Jojola, Journal Staff Report
Changes could be in store for the ordinance that governs police oversight.
"We needed more teeth," Police Oversight Commission Chairman Joe T. Gutierrez said. "Not only to oversee but to make sure that the process works."
The City Council is scheduled at its 5 p.m. Monday meeting to consider the bill to amend the existing ordinance.
The bill, as it was initially proposed, has forced discussion between the police department, officers union, the oversight commission and the independent review officer. Those groups have suggested additional changes.
The oversight commission and the independent review office were created under a bill passed in 1998 to enhance civilian oversight of the city police department.
"It is absolutely critical for these amendments to pass to give the POC the authority that goes along with the responsibility that the city has placed on them," said Jay Rowland, the city's independent review officer.
According to a council analysis, one change would clarify that, when the review officer and chief of police agree on findings, the findings would be considered final. In addition, the findings could not be changed without first notifying the POC, review officer and individuals involved in the complaint.
The change addresses a situation that arose when Police Chief Gil Gallegos changed some findings that were previously decided on by the review officer and POC, the analysis states.
"Without making this change, findings can be changed for any reason by the chief and are never really 'final,' '' the analysis reads.
Gallegos said there have only been two instances in which that has occurred, "and they were not citizen complaints, they were internal complaints."
Gutierrez said the biggest issue of contention seems to be an amendment that would require findings of the review officer to be placed in the police officer's record.
Another amendment deals with disagreements between the oversight commission and chief, Rowland said.
"The POC wanted an ability to resolve that by taking it to the (city's chief administrative officer)," Rowland said.
Sunday, May 2, 2004
Monday, March 29, 2004
Misconduct Allegations Try APD
By Chris Vogel, Journal Staff Writer
It's been a rough 10 months for the Albuquerque Police Department.
As Gilbert Gallegos enters his third year as police chief, the department faces allegations of corruption, officer misconduct and use of excessive force.
There are also union problems, staffing shortages and criticism from the city's independent review officer, who investigates citizen complaints.
But Mayor Martin Chávez said the jobs of Gallegos and Nick Bakas, chief public safety officer, are safe.
Chávez, in a recent interview, saluted APD for lowering the city's crime rate.
He said the department is on track.
"That doesn't mean (Gallegos and Bakas) have not been taken out to the woodshed a couple times; they have ... " he said. But, he added, "overall, the police department is doing very well."
Among APD's problems:
A high-ranking officer was disciplined for giving the mayor's wife a break on a parking ticket.
An officer was indicted last summer after he was accused of detaining people for no reason at traffic stops, and another resigned after he was accused of forcing a woman he had stopped to expose herself.
After a surprise inspection, the department's jail transfer station was shut down this month because of possible mistreatment of prisoners.
And potentially the most damaging: allegations that civilian employees stole thousands of dollars in money and property from APD's evidence unit, and that top officials covered it up.
Jay Rowland, the city's Independent Review Officer, has at times clashed with Gallegos over complaints of officer misconduct.
"The department clearly has some problems and needs civilian oversight," Rowland said recently.
Gallegos and Bakas acknowledge that APD has its troubles.
"I know we have a lot of issues we're addressing right now, but we have a good department," Gallegos said in an interview earlier this month. "It's a very professional department."
Said Bakas, "When we talk about corruption, I remember the days when officers were accused of murder and burglary— that in my mind is corruption. I've seen corruption, I know corruption, and we are not where we were many years ago. In perspective, we're doing very well."
Top brass under fire
The leadership of Gallegos and Bakas was questioned when the allegations of evidence theft surfaced.
In early March, an anonymous memo alleged that the two men at one point turned a blind eye to the accusations. They deny they delayed investigating the evidence unit and said the department should be recognized for locating, then investigating possible internal crime.
Evidence-handling problems are not new for APD. A 1999 city audit found improper storage of money, lax security, problems with evidence and inventory procedures and discrepancies between accounts.
As a result, cash is now kept in a vault behind a locked gate, according to a followup 2003 audit.
"Apparently, we had some ongoing problems with the evidence room," Gallegos said. "Why wasn't something done in 1999? It was me who initiated the (recent) internal investigation to find out what in the hell is going on, and some people seem to forget that.
"To let the unit go to what it was in 1999 and earlier would be irresponsible, but to do the things this department did was the common sense and professional thing to do, and I'd do it all over again."
He said the internal investigation was launched when a routine inspection in August uncovered possible misconduct by unit employees. Along with the internal probe, APD asked the Attorney General's Office to conduct an inquiry.
"I've heard all the rumors, and all I can say is that I hope the department acted as quickly as possible," said Jeff Remington, president of the Albuquerque Police Officers' Association.
Chávez said he was pleased that the AG's Office was brought in. Its findings will determine whether Gallegos and Bakas acted quickly enough, he said.
The parking ticket break for first lady Margaret Aragón de Chávez resulted in disciplinary action for APD Capt. Conrad Candelaria.
An internal investigation determined that Candelaria broke department procedures when he used his discretion to reduce the ticket to a warning. Candelaria has said that neither the mayor nor his wife had contacted APD.
Last summer, officers Christopher Chase and Duane Currell were indicted for allegedly abusing people during traffic stops.
Chase was fired for detaining people for no apparent reason, according to an indictment. In all, the indictment alleges that 11 people were victims of numerous crimes, including sexual assault.
In an unrelated incident, Currell resigned after he was accused of coercing a woman into exposing herself, then grabbing her during a traffic stop, according to an APD investigation.
Last fall, the department's emergency line came under scrutiny when residents failed to reach an operator after dialing 911. APD hired more operators after an internal review and a visit by Chávez to the dispatch room.
The prisoner transfer station near the Big I was closed after a surprise inspection by Rowland and internal affairs officers uncovered understaffing and possible mistreatment of prisoners. That means arresting officers must drive prisoners more than 20 miles to the new West Side jail.
Rowland reported a lack of medical care, an erratic toilet and a prisoner handcuffed outside the station without shoes and pants.
The fate of the station highlights what has been a thorny relationship between Gallegos and Rowland.
Rowland independently investigates citizen complaints and forwards his findings to the Police Oversight Commission, which makes a ruling. But it is up to Gallegos to decide if an officer is disciplined.
Rowland said Gallegos agrees with him on about 97 percent of his findings. But their most common disagreements are over cases involving excessive force.
In the past 18 months, Rowland said he has determined that officers used excessive force in 10 complaints, only one of which Gallegos sustained.
"Our non-concurrence rate is low, but it concerns me that it's in the use of excessive force (cases)," Rowland said.
One case in which he found excessive force was during an anti-war protest near the University of New Mexico in March 2003. Gallegos didn't agree, and the officer was not disciplined.
Earlier this month, the ACLU and the National Lawyers Guild filed a civil rights lawsuit claiming excessive force and free speech violations.
Despite APD's problems, Gallegos said his cops are taking care of the most important one— crime.
He pointed to national FBI crime figures, saying they show that crime dropped 10 percent in 2002 and 6 percent in 2003.
Goals for APD
Gallegos has a number of goals for APD, including installing a computer system that would allow officers to write reports online in their cars.
He has also started to replace the department's fleet of vehicles every five years as opposed to every eight years.
Remington said items like new cars help keep officers productive, but the greatest strain on morale is the lack of a contract. He said officers have not been given a raise or their promised pay step increases in more than two years.
In late February, Remington and other officers camped outside Civic Plaza for several nights to protest pay and what they say is a lack of leadership.
"In the past, APD was a very prestigious law enforcement agency, and hits like the evidence unit and not getting the (pay) steps damage morale," he said. "It hits the perception that we're working at a quality agency."
Gallegos said he was "very supportive regarding pay raises. I think our officers deserve them, and I am confident they will get something new in their paychecks in the next few months."
Chávez set a goal of staffing 1,000 officers by 2005, and the department failed to reach its intermediary goal of 955 in February. APD says it has 937 officers, while the union contends that the number is lower.
Bakas and Gallegos agree with the union that APD does not have enough officers.
"Yes, we are short," Gallegos said. "We know that, and that's why we're trying to beef up the force size."
Bakas acknowledges that a retiree who had a criminal record was hired and another was fired after failing a drug test, which was taken after the officer was assigned to full-time duty.
Regarding questions about his leadership, Gallegos mused during a recent interview about how public perceptions can change.
Thirty years ago, he was known as an Albuquerque police union advocate and became a national union leader as president of the national Fraternal Order of Police. He is still a board member.
"In 1975, I was mentioned in an Albuquerque Journal editorial as one of seven city heroes and leaders," he said. "Several years later, I'm a bum."
But Gallegos said he doesn't believe that about himself, and neither do Bakas and Chávez.
"I advise the chief on our preference on situations, but all the directors are expected to run their departments and the chief is doing a very good job," Bakas said.
It's been a rough 10 months for the Albuquerque Police Department.
As Gilbert Gallegos enters his third year as police chief, the department faces allegations of corruption, officer misconduct and use of excessive force.
There are also union problems, staffing shortages and criticism from the city's independent review officer, who investigates citizen complaints.
But Mayor Martin Chávez said the jobs of Gallegos and Nick Bakas, chief public safety officer, are safe.
Chávez, in a recent interview, saluted APD for lowering the city's crime rate.
He said the department is on track.
"That doesn't mean (Gallegos and Bakas) have not been taken out to the woodshed a couple times; they have ... " he said. But, he added, "overall, the police department is doing very well."
Among APD's problems:
A high-ranking officer was disciplined for giving the mayor's wife a break on a parking ticket.
An officer was indicted last summer after he was accused of detaining people for no reason at traffic stops, and another resigned after he was accused of forcing a woman he had stopped to expose herself.
After a surprise inspection, the department's jail transfer station was shut down this month because of possible mistreatment of prisoners.
And potentially the most damaging: allegations that civilian employees stole thousands of dollars in money and property from APD's evidence unit, and that top officials covered it up.
Jay Rowland, the city's Independent Review Officer, has at times clashed with Gallegos over complaints of officer misconduct.
"The department clearly has some problems and needs civilian oversight," Rowland said recently.
Gallegos and Bakas acknowledge that APD has its troubles.
"I know we have a lot of issues we're addressing right now, but we have a good department," Gallegos said in an interview earlier this month. "It's a very professional department."
Said Bakas, "When we talk about corruption, I remember the days when officers were accused of murder and burglary— that in my mind is corruption. I've seen corruption, I know corruption, and we are not where we were many years ago. In perspective, we're doing very well."
Top brass under fire
The leadership of Gallegos and Bakas was questioned when the allegations of evidence theft surfaced.
In early March, an anonymous memo alleged that the two men at one point turned a blind eye to the accusations. They deny they delayed investigating the evidence unit and said the department should be recognized for locating, then investigating possible internal crime.
Evidence-handling problems are not new for APD. A 1999 city audit found improper storage of money, lax security, problems with evidence and inventory procedures and discrepancies between accounts.
As a result, cash is now kept in a vault behind a locked gate, according to a followup 2003 audit.
"Apparently, we had some ongoing problems with the evidence room," Gallegos said. "Why wasn't something done in 1999? It was me who initiated the (recent) internal investigation to find out what in the hell is going on, and some people seem to forget that.
"To let the unit go to what it was in 1999 and earlier would be irresponsible, but to do the things this department did was the common sense and professional thing to do, and I'd do it all over again."
He said the internal investigation was launched when a routine inspection in August uncovered possible misconduct by unit employees. Along with the internal probe, APD asked the Attorney General's Office to conduct an inquiry.
"I've heard all the rumors, and all I can say is that I hope the department acted as quickly as possible," said Jeff Remington, president of the Albuquerque Police Officers' Association.
Chávez said he was pleased that the AG's Office was brought in. Its findings will determine whether Gallegos and Bakas acted quickly enough, he said.
The parking ticket break for first lady Margaret Aragón de Chávez resulted in disciplinary action for APD Capt. Conrad Candelaria.
An internal investigation determined that Candelaria broke department procedures when he used his discretion to reduce the ticket to a warning. Candelaria has said that neither the mayor nor his wife had contacted APD.
Last summer, officers Christopher Chase and Duane Currell were indicted for allegedly abusing people during traffic stops.
Chase was fired for detaining people for no apparent reason, according to an indictment. In all, the indictment alleges that 11 people were victims of numerous crimes, including sexual assault.
In an unrelated incident, Currell resigned after he was accused of coercing a woman into exposing herself, then grabbing her during a traffic stop, according to an APD investigation.
Last fall, the department's emergency line came under scrutiny when residents failed to reach an operator after dialing 911. APD hired more operators after an internal review and a visit by Chávez to the dispatch room.
The prisoner transfer station near the Big I was closed after a surprise inspection by Rowland and internal affairs officers uncovered understaffing and possible mistreatment of prisoners. That means arresting officers must drive prisoners more than 20 miles to the new West Side jail.
Rowland reported a lack of medical care, an erratic toilet and a prisoner handcuffed outside the station without shoes and pants.
The fate of the station highlights what has been a thorny relationship between Gallegos and Rowland.
Rowland independently investigates citizen complaints and forwards his findings to the Police Oversight Commission, which makes a ruling. But it is up to Gallegos to decide if an officer is disciplined.
Rowland said Gallegos agrees with him on about 97 percent of his findings. But their most common disagreements are over cases involving excessive force.
In the past 18 months, Rowland said he has determined that officers used excessive force in 10 complaints, only one of which Gallegos sustained.
"Our non-concurrence rate is low, but it concerns me that it's in the use of excessive force (cases)," Rowland said.
One case in which he found excessive force was during an anti-war protest near the University of New Mexico in March 2003. Gallegos didn't agree, and the officer was not disciplined.
Earlier this month, the ACLU and the National Lawyers Guild filed a civil rights lawsuit claiming excessive force and free speech violations.
Despite APD's problems, Gallegos said his cops are taking care of the most important one— crime.
He pointed to national FBI crime figures, saying they show that crime dropped 10 percent in 2002 and 6 percent in 2003.
Goals for APD
Gallegos has a number of goals for APD, including installing a computer system that would allow officers to write reports online in their cars.
He has also started to replace the department's fleet of vehicles every five years as opposed to every eight years.
Remington said items like new cars help keep officers productive, but the greatest strain on morale is the lack of a contract. He said officers have not been given a raise or their promised pay step increases in more than two years.
In late February, Remington and other officers camped outside Civic Plaza for several nights to protest pay and what they say is a lack of leadership.
"In the past, APD was a very prestigious law enforcement agency, and hits like the evidence unit and not getting the (pay) steps damage morale," he said. "It hits the perception that we're working at a quality agency."
Gallegos said he was "very supportive regarding pay raises. I think our officers deserve them, and I am confident they will get something new in their paychecks in the next few months."
Chávez set a goal of staffing 1,000 officers by 2005, and the department failed to reach its intermediary goal of 955 in February. APD says it has 937 officers, while the union contends that the number is lower.
Bakas and Gallegos agree with the union that APD does not have enough officers.
"Yes, we are short," Gallegos said. "We know that, and that's why we're trying to beef up the force size."
Bakas acknowledges that a retiree who had a criminal record was hired and another was fired after failing a drug test, which was taken after the officer was assigned to full-time duty.
Regarding questions about his leadership, Gallegos mused during a recent interview about how public perceptions can change.
Thirty years ago, he was known as an Albuquerque police union advocate and became a national union leader as president of the national Fraternal Order of Police. He is still a board member.
"In 1975, I was mentioned in an Albuquerque Journal editorial as one of seven city heroes and leaders," he said. "Several years later, I'm a bum."
But Gallegos said he doesn't believe that about himself, and neither do Bakas and Chávez.
"I advise the chief on our preference on situations, but all the directors are expected to run their departments and the chief is doing a very good job," Bakas said.
Friday, February 20, 2004
Suit Against City, Officer Dismissed
By Scott Sandlin, Journal Staff Writer
The city of Albuquerque and a city police officer are the winners in an excessive force lawsuit brought by the father of a girl shot with a Taser gun in 2000.
After two days of jury trial this week in federal court in Roswell, Judge Bobby Baldock granted a judgment Thursday in favor of the city before the defense presented its case.
The lawsuit was filed in 2002 by Andrew Aragon on behalf of his daughter, Christina Aragon, a high school student who was planning to attend a party at a vacant house. APD Officer Jeff Ferner shot the student as she attempted to flee from the home.
Baldock, a senior judge on the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, takes some New Mexico federal district court cases.
Baldock dismissed the lawsuit after ruling there was "no legally sufficient evidentiary basis on which a reasonable jury could find for the plaintiff."
According to the lawsuit, Christina Aragon was with friends who "believed they were supposed (to) open the house for a band to set up their equipment."
The Oct. 21, 2000, party at a home in the 900 block of Solano NE had been advertised through a flier circulated at Sandia High School. A copy of the flier was faxed to the Albuquerque Police Department because of satanic references, said Luis Robles, who represented Ferner at trial.
The students did not have permission to be in the vacant house, and APD officers waited at the home to see if anyone would illegally enter, the defense said.
Officers saw several individuals in Hidden Park, which is behind the home, jump the fence and attempt to enter the home.
After Aragon was shot, she underwent emergency surgery to remove metal barbs shot by the Taser, the complaint states. The barbs are connected to a handheld unit by thin wires that pulse electrical current into the target.
"His intention was to hit her in the back (only with the Taser charge), but because she was running down steps one of the barbs hit her in the back," Robles said.
In dismissing the case, Baldock also ruled the city can recover its costs from the plaintiff.
The city of Albuquerque and a city police officer are the winners in an excessive force lawsuit brought by the father of a girl shot with a Taser gun in 2000.
After two days of jury trial this week in federal court in Roswell, Judge Bobby Baldock granted a judgment Thursday in favor of the city before the defense presented its case.
The lawsuit was filed in 2002 by Andrew Aragon on behalf of his daughter, Christina Aragon, a high school student who was planning to attend a party at a vacant house. APD Officer Jeff Ferner shot the student as she attempted to flee from the home.
Baldock, a senior judge on the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, takes some New Mexico federal district court cases.
Baldock dismissed the lawsuit after ruling there was "no legally sufficient evidentiary basis on which a reasonable jury could find for the plaintiff."
According to the lawsuit, Christina Aragon was with friends who "believed they were supposed (to) open the house for a band to set up their equipment."
The Oct. 21, 2000, party at a home in the 900 block of Solano NE had been advertised through a flier circulated at Sandia High School. A copy of the flier was faxed to the Albuquerque Police Department because of satanic references, said Luis Robles, who represented Ferner at trial.
The students did not have permission to be in the vacant house, and APD officers waited at the home to see if anyone would illegally enter, the defense said.
Officers saw several individuals in Hidden Park, which is behind the home, jump the fence and attempt to enter the home.
After Aragon was shot, she underwent emergency surgery to remove metal barbs shot by the Taser, the complaint states. The barbs are connected to a handheld unit by thin wires that pulse electrical current into the target.
"His intention was to hit her in the back (only with the Taser charge), but because she was running down steps one of the barbs hit her in the back," Robles said.
In dismissing the case, Baldock also ruled the city can recover its costs from the plaintiff.
Saturday, February 7, 2004
Suits Say Ex-APD Officer A Rapist
By Scott Sandlin, Journal Staff Writer
Albuquerque police officer Christopher Chase was fired in 2003 after allegations of rapes and beatings while on duty led to his indictment on criminal charges.
As of this week, three civil lawsuits also have been filed against Chase or the Albuquerque Police Department. One lawsuit claims APD hired Chase even though he failed a psychological exam.
Mitsey Ramone, who accused Chase of sexually assaulting her, contends in a lawsuit that APD was negligent in hiring and keeping Chase, who "appears to be a serial rapist." The suit compares Chase to "an unchained vicious animal" who preyed upon women.
In answers filed by the contract attorney defending two of the civil cases, Chase and APD deny the claims.
A state District Court grand jury indicted Chase, 29, in June on 32 counts of criminal sexual penetration, battery and tampering with evidence. The criminal case involves allegations by 11 individuals of both sexes, some claiming they were beat up and others that they were sexually assaulted between September 2001 and January 2003.
The criminal case against Chase is awaiting trial in state District Court, where it is assigned to Judge Denise Barela Shepherd.
Ramone's civil lawsuit was filed in September by the Blake Law Firm and attorney Raul Lopez. It claims Chase failed a psychological test administered in conjunction with the APD selection process.
Ramone's claims stem from the Sept. 9, 2001, stop of a car in which she was the passenger. She says she was forced to perform sexual acts on Chase, after which he told Ramone to use sanitizing hand wash he had in his police unit.
The latest civil lawsuit was filed this week in U.S. District Court by Mary Han and Paul Kennedy on behalf of Cynthia Seeley, who also claims she was sexually assaulted by Chase.
Seeley and another woman were in a fight at an apartment in February 2002 when one of the women called police and Chase and other officers responded, the suit says.
Chase told them one needed to leave and "cool off," and Seeley did, the suit says. It says he then detoured Seeley into the back seat of his patrol car, drove down a deserted alley after midnight near the Marriott on Louisiana and took off his equipment belt, forced her to bend over the back seat and raped her.
Chase allegedly then drove away leaving her "alone and crying in the dark, deserted alley."
The suit seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages for excessive force and violations of Seeley's rights to due process and against unreasonable search and seizure.
In a lawsuit filed in state court by attorney Brad Hall, La Cueva High School student Matthew M. Bauer, 17, alleges that he was "inexplicably detained ... searched (and) terrorized" by Chase, who Bauer also says threatened to kill him.
Hall takes aim in the suit at Mayor Martin Chávez's policy of refusing to settle any lawsuits against police in the allegations.
"APD agency investigative machinery eventually identified defendant and relieved (him) from duty," the suit says. "Although plaintiff would rather settle this case, and although this case is one that could and should settle, the city currently maintains an official policy of bringing all police cases to trial. Hence this lawsuit and the need for the taxpayers to pay private attorney's fees to litigate a case normally handled by professional risk managers."
Because Bauer is related to a high-ranking APD official— he's the nephew of Public Safety Director Nick Bakas— he didn't run away when a police officer approached him and other teens near the Sportsplex in September 2002, according to the suit.
Bauer was standing by his car with about 10 La Cueva High School students who were talking and listening to music at about 10 p.m. when the police car approached on a dirt trail with its spotlight on and emergency lights flashing, Bauer's suit says.
"All other teens scattered on foot or in their cars," the suit says. "(Bauer's) passenger, the son of a city councilor, ran into an open field and hid."
Bauer responded to an order to get on his knees with his hands on his head and answered questions, then watched Chase search his wallet and car without a warrant and tell him to "get the (expletive) home," the suit says.
Bauer's friend, Brock Winter, called Bauer on his cell phone to pick him up and Chase was doing so, still in the Sportsplex area, when Chase again stopped him, shone a flashlight in his face and, when Bauer attempted to explain he was getting his friend, struck him in the center of his forehead with the flashlight, according to the suit.
After talking with his mother and uncle, Bauer was seen by a paramedic, reported the incident to police and gave a statement to Internal Affairs in an effort to identify the officer, the suit says.
Albuquerque police officer Christopher Chase was fired in 2003 after allegations of rapes and beatings while on duty led to his indictment on criminal charges.
As of this week, three civil lawsuits also have been filed against Chase or the Albuquerque Police Department. One lawsuit claims APD hired Chase even though he failed a psychological exam.
Mitsey Ramone, who accused Chase of sexually assaulting her, contends in a lawsuit that APD was negligent in hiring and keeping Chase, who "appears to be a serial rapist." The suit compares Chase to "an unchained vicious animal" who preyed upon women.
In answers filed by the contract attorney defending two of the civil cases, Chase and APD deny the claims.
A state District Court grand jury indicted Chase, 29, in June on 32 counts of criminal sexual penetration, battery and tampering with evidence. The criminal case involves allegations by 11 individuals of both sexes, some claiming they were beat up and others that they were sexually assaulted between September 2001 and January 2003.
The criminal case against Chase is awaiting trial in state District Court, where it is assigned to Judge Denise Barela Shepherd.
Ramone's civil lawsuit was filed in September by the Blake Law Firm and attorney Raul Lopez. It claims Chase failed a psychological test administered in conjunction with the APD selection process.
Ramone's claims stem from the Sept. 9, 2001, stop of a car in which she was the passenger. She says she was forced to perform sexual acts on Chase, after which he told Ramone to use sanitizing hand wash he had in his police unit.
The latest civil lawsuit was filed this week in U.S. District Court by Mary Han and Paul Kennedy on behalf of Cynthia Seeley, who also claims she was sexually assaulted by Chase.
Seeley and another woman were in a fight at an apartment in February 2002 when one of the women called police and Chase and other officers responded, the suit says.
Chase told them one needed to leave and "cool off," and Seeley did, the suit says. It says he then detoured Seeley into the back seat of his patrol car, drove down a deserted alley after midnight near the Marriott on Louisiana and took off his equipment belt, forced her to bend over the back seat and raped her.
Chase allegedly then drove away leaving her "alone and crying in the dark, deserted alley."
The suit seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages for excessive force and violations of Seeley's rights to due process and against unreasonable search and seizure.
In a lawsuit filed in state court by attorney Brad Hall, La Cueva High School student Matthew M. Bauer, 17, alleges that he was "inexplicably detained ... searched (and) terrorized" by Chase, who Bauer also says threatened to kill him.
Hall takes aim in the suit at Mayor Martin Chávez's policy of refusing to settle any lawsuits against police in the allegations.
"APD agency investigative machinery eventually identified defendant and relieved (him) from duty," the suit says. "Although plaintiff would rather settle this case, and although this case is one that could and should settle, the city currently maintains an official policy of bringing all police cases to trial. Hence this lawsuit and the need for the taxpayers to pay private attorney's fees to litigate a case normally handled by professional risk managers."
Because Bauer is related to a high-ranking APD official— he's the nephew of Public Safety Director Nick Bakas— he didn't run away when a police officer approached him and other teens near the Sportsplex in September 2002, according to the suit.
Bauer was standing by his car with about 10 La Cueva High School students who were talking and listening to music at about 10 p.m. when the police car approached on a dirt trail with its spotlight on and emergency lights flashing, Bauer's suit says.
"All other teens scattered on foot or in their cars," the suit says. "(Bauer's) passenger, the son of a city councilor, ran into an open field and hid."
Bauer responded to an order to get on his knees with his hands on his head and answered questions, then watched Chase search his wallet and car without a warrant and tell him to "get the (expletive) home," the suit says.
Bauer's friend, Brock Winter, called Bauer on his cell phone to pick him up and Chase was doing so, still in the Sportsplex area, when Chase again stopped him, shone a flashlight in his face and, when Bauer attempted to explain he was getting his friend, struck him in the center of his forehead with the flashlight, according to the suit.
After talking with his mother and uncle, Bauer was seen by a paramedic, reported the incident to police and gave a statement to Internal Affairs in an effort to identify the officer, the suit says.
Saturday, January 10, 2004
Police Panel Rules in Protest Conduct
By Lloyd Jojola, Journal Staff Report
Unreasonable force was used by a police officer during an anti-war demonstration last year, the Police Oversight Commission has said.
Thursday's decision supports the opinion of Independent Review Officer Jay Rowland but conflicts with Albuquerque Police Department Chief Gil Gallegos' findings.
Gallegos reviewed the complaint filed by Lane Leckman and does not believe the force used was excessive. Leckman, a physician, appealed the chief's findings to the commission.
The commission also ruled the officer failed to identify himself, an alleged standard procedure violation that Rowland and Gallegos said wasn't proven.
As a result of its action, the commission will write a letter to Gallegos asking him to reconsider his findings, Rowland said.
Police spokesman Jeff Arbogast said Friday the department had not seen the commission's written decision and could not immediately comment on the commission's action.
The incident occurred during a March 20 anti-war demonstration at Central near the University of New Mexico campus.
The crowd, marching west on Central, swelled into the hundreds and were met by police dressed in gas masks and helmets. Police arrested 17 people and cleared the street with tear gas.
Leckman said he was by the bookstore, standing on the sidewalk away from the street, when an officer ordered him to move.
" 'I'm standing on the sidewalk, what is the problem?' '' he said he told the officer, recounting the incident to the commission.
"The next thing I knew, without another word, without any explanation, his baton in both hands, he hit me full force on the chest, knocked me into my fiancee ... knocking her over and bruising her hip. I turned around to pick her up. Turned around and asked him what his name was. He looked at me and did not answer."
Police accounts differ, according to a synopsis of an investigation conducted by Independent Review Office staff. One officer interviewed said, "He did see a man and woman trip over some bicycles in a bike rack and fell. He denied that he or any other officer pushed these people."
A sergeant interviewed said he also saw a man and woman fall over a bike rack. "He didn't see anyone hit them just before they fell," the synopsis states.
Leckman also claims a 911 operator hung up on him when he called police. According to the investigation synopsis, 911 tapes were reviewed and it was discovered that one operator hung up on three callers from the protest.
"The operator did not ask if the callers were injured," the review states. "This operator also called her daughter and played the tape of a male caller choking and gasping. She then laughed about the man's condition."
The 911 operator was found to be in violation of two standard operating procedures, including one that pertains to the use of telephone etiquette.
Arbogast said the operator was disciplined.
Unreasonable force was used by a police officer during an anti-war demonstration last year, the Police Oversight Commission has said.
Thursday's decision supports the opinion of Independent Review Officer Jay Rowland but conflicts with Albuquerque Police Department Chief Gil Gallegos' findings.
Gallegos reviewed the complaint filed by Lane Leckman and does not believe the force used was excessive. Leckman, a physician, appealed the chief's findings to the commission.
The commission also ruled the officer failed to identify himself, an alleged standard procedure violation that Rowland and Gallegos said wasn't proven.
As a result of its action, the commission will write a letter to Gallegos asking him to reconsider his findings, Rowland said.
Police spokesman Jeff Arbogast said Friday the department had not seen the commission's written decision and could not immediately comment on the commission's action.
The incident occurred during a March 20 anti-war demonstration at Central near the University of New Mexico campus.
The crowd, marching west on Central, swelled into the hundreds and were met by police dressed in gas masks and helmets. Police arrested 17 people and cleared the street with tear gas.
Leckman said he was by the bookstore, standing on the sidewalk away from the street, when an officer ordered him to move.
" 'I'm standing on the sidewalk, what is the problem?' '' he said he told the officer, recounting the incident to the commission.
"The next thing I knew, without another word, without any explanation, his baton in both hands, he hit me full force on the chest, knocked me into my fiancee ... knocking her over and bruising her hip. I turned around to pick her up. Turned around and asked him what his name was. He looked at me and did not answer."
Police accounts differ, according to a synopsis of an investigation conducted by Independent Review Office staff. One officer interviewed said, "He did see a man and woman trip over some bicycles in a bike rack and fell. He denied that he or any other officer pushed these people."
A sergeant interviewed said he also saw a man and woman fall over a bike rack. "He didn't see anyone hit them just before they fell," the synopsis states.
Leckman also claims a 911 operator hung up on him when he called police. According to the investigation synopsis, 911 tapes were reviewed and it was discovered that one operator hung up on three callers from the protest.
"The operator did not ask if the callers were injured," the review states. "This operator also called her daughter and played the tape of a male caller choking and gasping. She then laughed about the man's condition."
The 911 operator was found to be in violation of two standard operating procedures, including one that pertains to the use of telephone etiquette.
Arbogast said the operator was disciplined.
Friday, December 19, 2003
Former Deputy Back in Prison
By Scott Sandlin, Journal Staff Writer
Darryl Burt appeared again in court this week on new drug charges. It was the third time the former Bernalillo County sheriff's deputy has faced criminal prosecution.
Burt's fall from grace began in April 1995 with his indictment on 34 counts related to alleged sexual abuse of a 16-year-old boy.
He eventually pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor counts, attempting to contribute to the delinquency of a minor and attempted sexual contact with a minor, but prosecutors said at the time that he had abused his position as an officer to prey on young Mexican nationals.
The next year he was back in court facing federal cocaine distribution charges. He pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute and was sentenced to two years and nine months in the drug case.
Burt completed his prison time and supervised release and was working when he was indicted in August on a charge of conspiracy to distribute heroin. He pleaded guilty to all three counts Tuesday.
Terms of the plea agreement call for Burt, 40, to spend eight years in federal prison.
The indictment alleged Burt conspired with Martin Rivas Munguia to distribute more than 100 grams of heroin in Bernalillo and Santa Fe counties from Sept. 29 to Dec. 6, 2002.
Munguia, who also has entered a guilty plea, is set for sentencing in February, but he will be subject to deportation because he was not legally in the United States, according to the prosecution.
The case was the result of an undercover operation by the FBI and New Mexico State Police that included a wiretap and surveillance, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Darryl Burt appeared again in court this week on new drug charges. It was the third time the former Bernalillo County sheriff's deputy has faced criminal prosecution.
Burt's fall from grace began in April 1995 with his indictment on 34 counts related to alleged sexual abuse of a 16-year-old boy.
He eventually pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor counts, attempting to contribute to the delinquency of a minor and attempted sexual contact with a minor, but prosecutors said at the time that he had abused his position as an officer to prey on young Mexican nationals.
The next year he was back in court facing federal cocaine distribution charges. He pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute and was sentenced to two years and nine months in the drug case.
Burt completed his prison time and supervised release and was working when he was indicted in August on a charge of conspiracy to distribute heroin. He pleaded guilty to all three counts Tuesday.
Terms of the plea agreement call for Burt, 40, to spend eight years in federal prison.
The indictment alleged Burt conspired with Martin Rivas Munguia to distribute more than 100 grams of heroin in Bernalillo and Santa Fe counties from Sept. 29 to Dec. 6, 2002.
Munguia, who also has entered a guilty plea, is set for sentencing in February, but he will be subject to deportation because he was not legally in the United States, according to the prosecution.
The case was the result of an undercover operation by the FBI and New Mexico State Police that included a wiretap and surveillance, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Thursday, November 7, 2002
City May Pay $450,000 for Police Dog Bite
November 7, 2002
Albuquerque Journal
The city could end up paying more than $400,000 to resolve an excessive force lawsuit brought by a teenager who was bitten by an Albuquerque police dog.
A federal court jury late Tuesday awarded 19-year-old Moriah Smith $50,000 in damages against APD officer Andrew Lehocky after concluding he violated her civil rights when his police dog, Bart, attacked Smith.
That set up a second phase of the trial to determine the city's liability based on APD policies and supervision of police dogs. Smith's attorneys had subpoenaed Mayor Martin Chávez and Police Chief Gil Gallegos to testify.
Just as those proceedings were to begin Wednesday, lawyers for Smith and the city reached a deal and the jury was dismissed.
"We looked at the verdict (against the officer) and the city decided not to appeal it," said Kathryn Levy, an assistant city attorney. She wouldn't elaborate. The city, which was also named in the lawsuit, is responsible for paying the $50,000 against the officer and attorneys fees in the case.
Smith and her lawyers, Brad Hall and Joe Kennedy, called the verdict and resolution a victory.
"The plaintiff believed that police should warn people that they're going to use an attack dog and if they don't warn them they should use a leash or a muzzle because it's a serious level of force," said attorney Brad Hall. "We appreciate the jury figuring out the big picture."
Smith, then 16, was unarmed and hiding from police at a Northeast Heights schoolyard in 1999 when Lehocky unleashed the 80-pound Belgian Malinois to find her. The dog clamped down on Smith's right leg, causing injuries that resulted in three surgeries.
Police were investigating a report that Smith had been seen with a boy who had fired a gun at a group of youths at a nearby park.
According to testimony, no warning was given before the dog was unleashed. Smith later was charged with trespassing on school property.
Lehocky's lawyers argued that Smith was responsible for events that led to the bite. They said Lehocky acted reasonably in unleashing the dog to find a suspect who possibly was armed and dangerous.
Smith testified that she would have surrendered had she been warned. Because they prevailed on the civil rights claim, Smith's lawyers were entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs. The agreement allows an arbitrator to determine the amount the city will pay Smith's lawyers.
Kennedy said the total price tag — including the $50,000 for Smith — could run as high as $450,000.
As part of the deal, APD Chief Gallegos and Schultz agreed to review APD policies on when and how police dogs are deployed, Hall said.
"We have confidence that they'll take us seriously," said Kennedy.
Smith said she will now have money to pay for plastic surgery on the deep scar the bite left.
"It wasn't (about getting) the money for me," said Smith, who now lives in Pennsylvania. "It was the moral of the whole situation. These dogs shouldn't be allowed to bite people."
As part of the agreement, an official judgment against Lehocky won't be entered in court records.
"In a future case (such a judgment) could have been used by another lawyer against Lehocky," said the officer's attorney Luis Robles.
Lehocky still faces three other dog bite lawsuits, Robles said.
Robles said his client was "very disappointed" by the jury verdict at the conclusion of the four-day trial.
"I see it as a compromise verdict," Robles said, noting that the jury gave Smith nothing for pain and suffering and awarded no punitive damages.
Robles said Smith's plastic surgeon testified that surgery to reduce the scar would cost about $50,000.
"I would have thought that if they thought Officer Lehocky did something he shouldn't have, they would have given her more than just the money to fix her scar," Robles said.
Jury verdicts in dog bite cases nationwide have tended to favor the police, experts say.
Earlier this year, Lehocky was exonerated in two lawsuits involving police dog bites. In 2000, the city settled a dog bite claim against him for $210,000.
That led to Lehocky, a 20-year-veteran, transferring from the dog unit to the SWAT team. A year earlier, he received an award from then-Police Chief Jerry Galvin for stellar work in the K-9 unit.
Kennedy and Hall on Wednesday had planned to introduce evidence of prior injuries caused by police dogs, how police review such cases, and APD police dogs' failure to guard and bark as trained.
City Attorney Bob White said the agreement didn't conflict with the mayor's policy against settling civil rights cases filed against APD.
He said Chávez never meant to imply the city would appeal all jury verdicts against the police. The no-settlement rule, he said, applies to pre-trial settlements. Chávez instituted the settlement ban in January, saying allegations of misconduct should be aired publicly and not behind closed doors by lawyers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
