By: Eric Kahnert, Eyewitness News 4, and Reed Upton, KOB.com
See Tha Video Here
A city councilor working with the mayor’s office has introduced legislation that would create an online registry of the mug shots of gang members. Councilor Ken Sanchez introduced the bill Monday night. The council will consider it at the next council meeting. Under Sanchez’s proposal, the pictures and names of gang members would be available on line if APD determines someone was involved in a gang related crime. Addresses will not be posted with the pictures and names in order to minimize the possibility of retaliation.
Sanchez says, unlike the sex offenders Website, people on the gang Website could eventually get off of it.
“Young kids make mistakes and hopefully they will take the right path in the future,” he says. “Once they’re on the registry, it’ll be for two years unless they take a prevention program. [Then] they’ll be taken off immediately.”
*** *** ***
Some thoughts from a citizen with eyes open:
So walking with two of your friends on central will get youth entered into an online database next to sex offenders and pets that the city is about to euthanize!! How would you feel if the APD or APS Police entered your kid into this database, branding them as a gangster for two years, maybe the rest of their life?
How does the APD define who is in a gang? Baggy pants? Brown or Black skin? A blue hat?
This humiliating bill didn't pass, but we should count it as a near victory for legalized racial profiling. Call up Mayor Martin "Gentry" Chavez and Councillor Ken Sanchez and let them know that this looks like just another vindictive attack on youth of color by the City government.
You can leave comments for Councillor Ken Sanchez here:
If the idea is to protect the public, we should create an online database of crooked politicians and abusive cops, with their photos and descriptions of their crimes.
Showing posts with label Racial Profiling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Racial Profiling. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Friday, May 11, 2007
APD, IRO strike deal on complaint against officer
By Maggie Shepard, Albuquerque Tribune
An Albuquerque police SWAT officer faces discipline for falsifying arrest documents, but has been exonerated on other charges leveled in a complaint last year.
The complaint filed with the Independent Review Office stemmed from a man's arrest in October on charges of littering and disobeying a police officer. It alleged that Officer Eric Brown made up a reason to justify the arrest.
Jay Rowland, the city's recently retired Independent Review Officer, investigated the complaint and sided with the civilian, but Police Chief Ray Schultz disagreed.
The differing views could have been brought before the volunteer Police Oversight Commission at its televised meeting Thursday night, but a last-minute deal between the Albuquerque Police Department and the review office kept the issue out of public view.
The deal concedes that Brown did falsify the documents, but not intentionally, said APD Internal Affairs Lt. Paul Feist.
It also concedes that the department's disciplinary plan for him is sufficient, said IRO investigator Trey Flynt.
Word of the agreement spread quickly through the audience, which was packed with Albuquerque police officers, including several of Brown's superiors.
Lt. Bob Huntsman, Brown's SWAT commander, said the two dozen SWAT team and bomb squad members came to the meeting to support their fellow officer.
Huntsman said he felt satisfied with the agreement, which has yet to be finalized by Schultz and must still go before the commission for final approval at its June meeting.
The police report of the incident says Brown found an American Indian man and his family parked in a handicap spot at a Wal-Mart.
Brown says in his report that "they obviously did not have any physical impairments."
He wrote that after he confronted the family, members yelled at him, accused him of racially profiling them and then one of the vehicle occupants tossed his gum on the ground. He only picked it up after several commands to do so, Brown wrote.
The report also says that when Brown suspected the man of being intoxicated, the man became belligerent and would not provide identification.
The woman in the car filed the complaint. It says the family showed Brown a handicap sticker for their son's illness, but that Brown continued to harass them using curse words to the point their children began to cry and bystanders began to ask if they were OK.
Feist and Flynt, representing the police and the IRO, respectively, agreed that Brown broke several rules in addition to falsifying documents, but was exonerated of other allegations in the complaint.
Discipline matters, including officers' names, are generally not made public by the Police Department; the oversight commission does not reveal officers' names.
Brown's name was found in several court and police documents related to the case.
In other news from the meeting:
The political stalemate between the City Council and Mayor Martin Chavez that has kept one commission seat vacant continued.
For at least the 12th time, commissioners heard the mayor's staff say he has submitted a candidate to represent Councilor Brad Winter's district on the commission and is waiting for the council to vote on it.
For at least the 12th time, commissioners heard City Council staff say the council rejected the mayor's candidate. The council maintains that the mayor must select one of Winter's two proposed candidates, and forward one for approval.
Chavez says the city charter allows him to pick whomever he wants, and this time it wasn't one from Winter - a political rival.
Newly selected Independent Review Officer William Deaton, up for confirmation at the next City Council meeting, did not attend.
Nor did his predecessor, Jay Rowland, who retired in April.
The commission gave Schultz its support in light of a recent police union action that may result in giving the chief a vote of no confidence.
Some union members started the process to denounce the chief in an April meeting. The final vote comes in about three weeks.
An Albuquerque police SWAT officer faces discipline for falsifying arrest documents, but has been exonerated on other charges leveled in a complaint last year.
The complaint filed with the Independent Review Office stemmed from a man's arrest in October on charges of littering and disobeying a police officer. It alleged that Officer Eric Brown made up a reason to justify the arrest.
Jay Rowland, the city's recently retired Independent Review Officer, investigated the complaint and sided with the civilian, but Police Chief Ray Schultz disagreed.
The differing views could have been brought before the volunteer Police Oversight Commission at its televised meeting Thursday night, but a last-minute deal between the Albuquerque Police Department and the review office kept the issue out of public view.
The deal concedes that Brown did falsify the documents, but not intentionally, said APD Internal Affairs Lt. Paul Feist.
It also concedes that the department's disciplinary plan for him is sufficient, said IRO investigator Trey Flynt.
Word of the agreement spread quickly through the audience, which was packed with Albuquerque police officers, including several of Brown's superiors.
Lt. Bob Huntsman, Brown's SWAT commander, said the two dozen SWAT team and bomb squad members came to the meeting to support their fellow officer.
Huntsman said he felt satisfied with the agreement, which has yet to be finalized by Schultz and must still go before the commission for final approval at its June meeting.
The police report of the incident says Brown found an American Indian man and his family parked in a handicap spot at a Wal-Mart.
Brown says in his report that "they obviously did not have any physical impairments."
He wrote that after he confronted the family, members yelled at him, accused him of racially profiling them and then one of the vehicle occupants tossed his gum on the ground. He only picked it up after several commands to do so, Brown wrote.
The report also says that when Brown suspected the man of being intoxicated, the man became belligerent and would not provide identification.
The woman in the car filed the complaint. It says the family showed Brown a handicap sticker for their son's illness, but that Brown continued to harass them using curse words to the point their children began to cry and bystanders began to ask if they were OK.
Feist and Flynt, representing the police and the IRO, respectively, agreed that Brown broke several rules in addition to falsifying documents, but was exonerated of other allegations in the complaint.
Discipline matters, including officers' names, are generally not made public by the Police Department; the oversight commission does not reveal officers' names.
Brown's name was found in several court and police documents related to the case.
In other news from the meeting:
The political stalemate between the City Council and Mayor Martin Chavez that has kept one commission seat vacant continued.
For at least the 12th time, commissioners heard the mayor's staff say he has submitted a candidate to represent Councilor Brad Winter's district on the commission and is waiting for the council to vote on it.
For at least the 12th time, commissioners heard City Council staff say the council rejected the mayor's candidate. The council maintains that the mayor must select one of Winter's two proposed candidates, and forward one for approval.
Chavez says the city charter allows him to pick whomever he wants, and this time it wasn't one from Winter - a political rival.
Newly selected Independent Review Officer William Deaton, up for confirmation at the next City Council meeting, did not attend.
Nor did his predecessor, Jay Rowland, who retired in April.
The commission gave Schultz its support in light of a recent police union action that may result in giving the chief a vote of no confidence.
Some union members started the process to denounce the chief in an April meeting. The final vote comes in about three weeks.
Monday, April 30, 2007
Study: Police treat minorities unfairly
by Michael J. Sniffen, The Associated Press
WASHINGTON - African-American, Hispanic and white drivers are equally likely to be pulled over by police, but African-Americans and Hispanics are much more likely to be searched and arrested, a federal study found.
Police were much more likely to threaten or use force against African-Americans and Hispanics than against whites in any encounter, whether at a traffic stop or elsewhere, according to the Justice Department.
The study, released Sunday by the department's Bureau of Justice Statistics, covered police contacts with the public during 2005 and was based on interviews by the Census Bureau with nearly 64,000 people age 16 or over.
"The numbers are very consistent" with those found in a similar study of police-public contacts in 2002, bureau statistician Matthew R. Durose, the report's co-author, said in an interview. "There's some stability in the findings over these three years."
Traffic stops have become a politically volatile issue. Minority groups have complained that many stops and searches are based on race rather than on legitimate suspicions. African-Americans in particular have complained of being pulled over for simply "driving while black."
"The available data is sketchy but deeply concerning," said Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP's Washington bureau. The civil rights organization has done its own surveys of traffic stops, and he said the racial disparities grow larger, the deeper the studies delve.
"It's very important to look at the hit rates for searches - the number that actually result in finding a crime," Shelton said. "There's a great deal of racial disparity there." He called for federal legislation that would collect uniform data by race on stops, arrests, use of force, searches and hit rates.
"This report shows there are still disturbing disparities in terms of what happens to people of color after the stop," said Dennis Parker, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's racial justice project. He said better reporting is needed.
Like the 2002 report, this one contained a warning that the racial disparities uncovered "do not constitute proof that police treat people differently along demographic lines" because the differences could be explained by circumstances not analyzed by the survey. The 2002 report said such circumstances might include driver conduct or whether drugs were in plain view.
Traffic stops are the most frequent way police interact with the public, accounting for 41 percent of all contacts. An estimated 17.8 million drivers were stopped in 2005.
African-American, Hispanic and white motorists were equally likely to be pulled over by police - between 8 percent and 9 percent of each group. The slight decline in African-Americans pulled over - from 9.2 percent in 2002 to 8.1 percent in 2005 - was not statistically significant, Durose said, and could be the result of random
differences.
The racial disparities showed up after that point:
-African-Americans (9.5 percent) and Hispanics (8.8 percent) were much more likely to be searched than whites (3.6 percent). There were slight but statistically insignificant declines compared with the 2002 report in the percentages of African-Americans and Hispanics searched.
-African-Americans (4.5 percent) were more than twice as likely as whites (2.1 percent) to be arrested. Hispanic drivers were arrested 3.1 percent of the time.
Among all police-public contacts, force was used 1.6 percent of the time. But African-Americans (4.4 percent) and Hispanics (2.3 percent) were more likely than whites (1.2 percent) to be subjected to force or the threat of force by police officers.
People interviewed described police hitting, kicking, pushing, grabbing, pointing a gun or spraying pepper spray at them or threatening to do so. More than four of five felt the force used was excessive, but there were no statistically significant racial disparities among the people who felt that way.
Two years ago, the Bush administration's handling of the 2002 report and its finding of racial disparities generated considerable controversy.
Departing from normal practice, the earlier report was simply posted on the statistics bureau's Web site without any press release announcing it.
The bureau's director at the time, Lawrence A. Greenfeld, appointed by President Bush in 2001, wanted to publicize the racial disparities, but his superiors disagreed, according to a statistics bureau employee. Greenfeld told his staff he was being moved to a new job following the dispute, according to this employee, who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to reporters.
This time there was a press release.
WASHINGTON - African-American, Hispanic and white drivers are equally likely to be pulled over by police, but African-Americans and Hispanics are much more likely to be searched and arrested, a federal study found.
Police were much more likely to threaten or use force against African-Americans and Hispanics than against whites in any encounter, whether at a traffic stop or elsewhere, according to the Justice Department.
The study, released Sunday by the department's Bureau of Justice Statistics, covered police contacts with the public during 2005 and was based on interviews by the Census Bureau with nearly 64,000 people age 16 or over.
"The numbers are very consistent" with those found in a similar study of police-public contacts in 2002, bureau statistician Matthew R. Durose, the report's co-author, said in an interview. "There's some stability in the findings over these three years."
Traffic stops have become a politically volatile issue. Minority groups have complained that many stops and searches are based on race rather than on legitimate suspicions. African-Americans in particular have complained of being pulled over for simply "driving while black."
"The available data is sketchy but deeply concerning," said Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP's Washington bureau. The civil rights organization has done its own surveys of traffic stops, and he said the racial disparities grow larger, the deeper the studies delve.
"It's very important to look at the hit rates for searches - the number that actually result in finding a crime," Shelton said. "There's a great deal of racial disparity there." He called for federal legislation that would collect uniform data by race on stops, arrests, use of force, searches and hit rates.
"This report shows there are still disturbing disparities in terms of what happens to people of color after the stop," said Dennis Parker, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's racial justice project. He said better reporting is needed.
Like the 2002 report, this one contained a warning that the racial disparities uncovered "do not constitute proof that police treat people differently along demographic lines" because the differences could be explained by circumstances not analyzed by the survey. The 2002 report said such circumstances might include driver conduct or whether drugs were in plain view.
Traffic stops are the most frequent way police interact with the public, accounting for 41 percent of all contacts. An estimated 17.8 million drivers were stopped in 2005.
African-American, Hispanic and white motorists were equally likely to be pulled over by police - between 8 percent and 9 percent of each group. The slight decline in African-Americans pulled over - from 9.2 percent in 2002 to 8.1 percent in 2005 - was not statistically significant, Durose said, and could be the result of random
differences.
The racial disparities showed up after that point:
-African-Americans (9.5 percent) and Hispanics (8.8 percent) were much more likely to be searched than whites (3.6 percent). There were slight but statistically insignificant declines compared with the 2002 report in the percentages of African-Americans and Hispanics searched.
-African-Americans (4.5 percent) were more than twice as likely as whites (2.1 percent) to be arrested. Hispanic drivers were arrested 3.1 percent of the time.
Among all police-public contacts, force was used 1.6 percent of the time. But African-Americans (4.4 percent) and Hispanics (2.3 percent) were more likely than whites (1.2 percent) to be subjected to force or the threat of force by police officers.
People interviewed described police hitting, kicking, pushing, grabbing, pointing a gun or spraying pepper spray at them or threatening to do so. More than four of five felt the force used was excessive, but there were no statistically significant racial disparities among the people who felt that way.
Two years ago, the Bush administration's handling of the 2002 report and its finding of racial disparities generated considerable controversy.
Departing from normal practice, the earlier report was simply posted on the statistics bureau's Web site without any press release announcing it.
The bureau's director at the time, Lawrence A. Greenfeld, appointed by President Bush in 2001, wanted to publicize the racial disparities, but his superiors disagreed, according to a statistics bureau employee. Greenfeld told his staff he was being moved to a new job following the dispute, according to this employee, who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to reporters.
This time there was a press release.
Saturday, January 15, 2005
APD Chief Stands by Officer; Racial Profiling Accusation Made
By T.J. Wilham, Journal Staff Writer
Police Chief Gilbert Gallegos is claiming a Police Oversight Commissioner overstepped his bounds when he accused one of his officers of racial profiling.
The accused officer has called for commissioner J. L'Keith Jones, an Albuquerque minister, to resign.
Jones, who is black, said Friday he has no intention to resign from the commission and he still believes the white officer, Gerald Roach, was guilty of racial profiling.
"Racial profiling occurs every day, and I am a victim along with thousands of other people," Jones said. "There is not a day that goes by where a cop doesn't run my license plate or give me a look."
Gallegos said Friday he does not share Roach's opinion that Jones should resign. Gallegos stood behind his officer saying he has known Roach for 20 years and he is not biased.
"He continues to believe that this officer is a racist, and I believe that is wrong," Gallegos said.
During a November commission meeting, Jones said he was racially profiled when Roach stopped him for speeding and then arrested him on an outstanding warrant from Guadalupe County.
The warrant proved to be issued in error and the bond money Jones paid was returned to him.
Gallegos said the traffic stop was never officially investigated because Jones never filed a complaint with the department.
At a commission meeting Thursday, Roach and Gallegos attacked Jones, claiming he had made false accusations.
"Mr. Jones' comments have the potential of ruining my career, my family and family reputation," Roach told the commission. "It hurts more than just me being the target of his accusation. Mr. Jones slandered me in the media. I have been convicted of being a racist without so much of due process for our little incident."
Roach claimed he was not given an opportunity to comment in the Journal article, which was published Dec. 5.
Before publishing the article, the Journal made four attempts to contact Roach. He did not return phone calls.
After the story appeared, a letter from Roach was published.
On Friday, Roach could not be reached for comment. A message for Roach was also left with an APD public information officer.
After Thursday's meeting, Roach told KOAT-TV that he thought Jones should resign.
After Roach and Gallegos made their remarks to the commission, Joe Gutierrez, commission chairman, apologized to Roach.
Gutierrez said no other commissioner had anything to do with Jones' remarks.
Jones said he felt it was inappropriate for Gallegos and Roach to address the issue during a public meeting. He said Gallegos rarely attends the meetings.
Police Chief Gilbert Gallegos is claiming a Police Oversight Commissioner overstepped his bounds when he accused one of his officers of racial profiling.
The accused officer has called for commissioner J. L'Keith Jones, an Albuquerque minister, to resign.
Jones, who is black, said Friday he has no intention to resign from the commission and he still believes the white officer, Gerald Roach, was guilty of racial profiling.
"Racial profiling occurs every day, and I am a victim along with thousands of other people," Jones said. "There is not a day that goes by where a cop doesn't run my license plate or give me a look."
Gallegos said Friday he does not share Roach's opinion that Jones should resign. Gallegos stood behind his officer saying he has known Roach for 20 years and he is not biased.
"He continues to believe that this officer is a racist, and I believe that is wrong," Gallegos said.
During a November commission meeting, Jones said he was racially profiled when Roach stopped him for speeding and then arrested him on an outstanding warrant from Guadalupe County.
The warrant proved to be issued in error and the bond money Jones paid was returned to him.
Gallegos said the traffic stop was never officially investigated because Jones never filed a complaint with the department.
At a commission meeting Thursday, Roach and Gallegos attacked Jones, claiming he had made false accusations.
"Mr. Jones' comments have the potential of ruining my career, my family and family reputation," Roach told the commission. "It hurts more than just me being the target of his accusation. Mr. Jones slandered me in the media. I have been convicted of being a racist without so much of due process for our little incident."
Roach claimed he was not given an opportunity to comment in the Journal article, which was published Dec. 5.
Before publishing the article, the Journal made four attempts to contact Roach. He did not return phone calls.
After the story appeared, a letter from Roach was published.
On Friday, Roach could not be reached for comment. A message for Roach was also left with an APD public information officer.
After Thursday's meeting, Roach told KOAT-TV that he thought Jones should resign.
After Roach and Gallegos made their remarks to the commission, Joe Gutierrez, commission chairman, apologized to Roach.
Gutierrez said no other commissioner had anything to do with Jones' remarks.
Jones said he felt it was inappropriate for Gallegos and Roach to address the issue during a public meeting. He said Gallegos rarely attends the meetings.
Saturday, December 11, 2004
APD Racial Profiling Allegations Continue
aturday, December 11, 2004
APD Racial Profiling Allegations Continue
By Jeff Proctor
Journal Staff Writer
The Albuquerque Police Oversight Commission says accusations of racial profiling have not ceased.
The commission voted unanimously Thursday to direct the city's Independent Review Office to send a letter to APD Chief Gilbert Gallegos, asking him to look closely at whether biased-based policing is practiced by the department.
According to APD's procedures, officers are not to target individuals based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religious affiliation or economic status.
"If APD does not practice it, we need to find a way for them to not be accused of it so often," said the Rev. J. L'Keith Jones, a commission member. "Their standard needs to be upheld, and the mayor's task force needs to be upheld."
Mayor Martin Chávez created the 18-member task force in March to determine whether biased-based policing occurs within the city.
The commission has dealt with numerous instances of alleged profiling, most recently on Thursday, when it considered a complaint filed on behalf of Essa Dalloul.
In May, Albuquerque police detained Dalloul, then 20, for more than two hours at Coronado Center after mall security guards saw two Middle Eastern men praying outside. However, Dalloul was not one of the men praying, according to an Independent Review Office investigation.
The officers didn't arrest Dalloul, but when they checked his identification against a national database, a notice appeared to contact the FBI, the investigation shows.
Officers also detained several "Arab" people inside the mall who said they knew Dalloul and asked them for ID, the investigation states.
Initially, Gallegos told the officers not to talk about the reasons they called the FBI, and he also refused to be interviewed by the Independent Review Office. Gallegos and the officers later cooperated.
Gallegos and Independent Review Officer Jay Rowland determined there was not enough evidence to say the officers used racial profiling, so they did not sustain the complaint. Dalloul could not be reached for comment.
"I agree that racial profiling takes place, but, in this case, it sounds like the officers got it straightened out after they discovered they had the wrong guy," said Commissioner Michael Cook, who along with five other commissioners upheld Rowland's decision.
And though Jones also agreed to not sustain the complaint, he issued a stern warning: "We need to address this, and the chief needs to address this, or as long as our military is in Iraq, we're going to have a steady stream of cases coming before us with members of the Arab community."
APD Racial Profiling Allegations Continue
By Jeff Proctor
Journal Staff Writer
The Albuquerque Police Oversight Commission says accusations of racial profiling have not ceased.
The commission voted unanimously Thursday to direct the city's Independent Review Office to send a letter to APD Chief Gilbert Gallegos, asking him to look closely at whether biased-based policing is practiced by the department.
According to APD's procedures, officers are not to target individuals based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religious affiliation or economic status.
"If APD does not practice it, we need to find a way for them to not be accused of it so often," said the Rev. J. L'Keith Jones, a commission member. "Their standard needs to be upheld, and the mayor's task force needs to be upheld."
Mayor Martin Chávez created the 18-member task force in March to determine whether biased-based policing occurs within the city.
The commission has dealt with numerous instances of alleged profiling, most recently on Thursday, when it considered a complaint filed on behalf of Essa Dalloul.
In May, Albuquerque police detained Dalloul, then 20, for more than two hours at Coronado Center after mall security guards saw two Middle Eastern men praying outside. However, Dalloul was not one of the men praying, according to an Independent Review Office investigation.
The officers didn't arrest Dalloul, but when they checked his identification against a national database, a notice appeared to contact the FBI, the investigation shows.
Officers also detained several "Arab" people inside the mall who said they knew Dalloul and asked them for ID, the investigation states.
Initially, Gallegos told the officers not to talk about the reasons they called the FBI, and he also refused to be interviewed by the Independent Review Office. Gallegos and the officers later cooperated.
Gallegos and Independent Review Officer Jay Rowland determined there was not enough evidence to say the officers used racial profiling, so they did not sustain the complaint. Dalloul could not be reached for comment.
"I agree that racial profiling takes place, but, in this case, it sounds like the officers got it straightened out after they discovered they had the wrong guy," said Commissioner Michael Cook, who along with five other commissioners upheld Rowland's decision.
And though Jones also agreed to not sustain the complaint, he issued a stern warning: "We need to address this, and the chief needs to address this, or as long as our military is in Iraq, we're going to have a steady stream of cases coming before us with members of the Arab community."
Saturday, May 22, 2004
Muslim Mallgoers Detained by Police
By Olivier Uyttebrouck, Journal Staff Writer
Members of Albuquerque's Islamic community said police practiced racial profiling on Sunday by detaining eight people for up to two hours at Coronado Center.
Essa Dalloul, 20, said an Albuquerque police officer stopped him about 6 p.m. in the mall concourse, placed him in handcuffs and made him sit on the floor for nearly two hours before releasing him.
"I felt kind of embarrassed and humiliated," Dalloul said Friday at a news conference at the Islamic Center of New Mexico. "I just went shopping, and I find myself on the floor in handcuffs."
Albuquerque Police Department Chief Gil Gallegos said officers were summoned by mall security after two Middle Eastern men were seen praying outside the mall. Dalloul, who was not one of the men praying, was cuffed and detained for about 45 minutes, he said.
"He was not arrested and he was not mistreated," Gallegos said of Dalloul. "There was no racial profiling."
Police have remained on heightened alert since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, he said.
"We responded to (mall) security's call," he said. "Doing anything less would be a disservice because of security concerns since 9/11."
Ahmad Assed, Dalloul's attorney, said the report of Islamic men praying near the mall did not justify police detaining and cuffing Dalloul, an Albuquerque resident and U.S. citizen.
Muslims pray five times a day and the two men had found a grassy place near the mall to pray, Assed said. Police brought the two men into the mall but did not cuff them, he said.
Five of Dalloul's friends and relatives asked police why they were holding Dalloul, Assed said. Police responded by seizing their identification cards until about 8 p.m., he said.
"We strongly recommend that (Albuquerque police) make an effort to educate its personnel on Islamic practices and that it make an effort to reach out to our Islamic community," board members of the Islamic Center said in a written statement.
Members of Albuquerque's Islamic community said police practiced racial profiling on Sunday by detaining eight people for up to two hours at Coronado Center.
Essa Dalloul, 20, said an Albuquerque police officer stopped him about 6 p.m. in the mall concourse, placed him in handcuffs and made him sit on the floor for nearly two hours before releasing him.
"I felt kind of embarrassed and humiliated," Dalloul said Friday at a news conference at the Islamic Center of New Mexico. "I just went shopping, and I find myself on the floor in handcuffs."
Albuquerque Police Department Chief Gil Gallegos said officers were summoned by mall security after two Middle Eastern men were seen praying outside the mall. Dalloul, who was not one of the men praying, was cuffed and detained for about 45 minutes, he said.
"He was not arrested and he was not mistreated," Gallegos said of Dalloul. "There was no racial profiling."
Police have remained on heightened alert since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, he said.
"We responded to (mall) security's call," he said. "Doing anything less would be a disservice because of security concerns since 9/11."
Ahmad Assed, Dalloul's attorney, said the report of Islamic men praying near the mall did not justify police detaining and cuffing Dalloul, an Albuquerque resident and U.S. citizen.
Muslims pray five times a day and the two men had found a grassy place near the mall to pray, Assed said. Police brought the two men into the mall but did not cuff them, he said.
Five of Dalloul's friends and relatives asked police why they were holding Dalloul, Assed said. Police responded by seizing their identification cards until about 8 p.m., he said.
"We strongly recommend that (Albuquerque police) make an effort to educate its personnel on Islamic practices and that it make an effort to reach out to our Islamic community," board members of the Islamic Center said in a written statement.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
